A real estate appraisal is an estimate of the value that a property can be sold for, given prevailing market conditions. An appraisal (also called a valuation) is typically conducted prior to the completion of a sale of a single-family residential property or when a homeowner decides to refinance an existing mortgage. A lender requires an appraisal before granting a mortgage because the financed property is often used as collateral, which can be seized and resold to recoup losses if the borrower defaults on the loan. This In Focus summarizes valuation challenges, regulatory developments, and a recent policy issue pertaining to single-family property appraisals.
Property Valuation Challenges
Conceptually, products with identical characteristics or features as well as high sales volumes should have values that are relatively easy to determine. Single-family properties, however, are not identical, thus increasing the difficulty to determine their values.
For these reasons, determining property values is challenging. Valuations are oftentimes estimated using properties that lack identical characteristics. Extreme low- or high-end properties located in decidedly distinct geographic areas tend to have fewer like transactions, making them more difficult to appraise. Furthermore, appraisals reflect market conditions when they were prepared, causing past estimations to diverge from current values should market conditions change over time.
Federal Regulation of Appraisal Industry
The sections below discuss (in chronological order) the legislative developments resulting in the current federal regulatory framework of the appraisal industry.
Establishment of Federal Regulatory Framework
Congressional interest in real estate appraisals dates back to at least the late 1980s following the Savings and Loan (S&L) crisis. (S&L associations were nonprofit, member-owned cooperative financial institutions that relied on member savings deposits to fund residential home mortgages. See CRS Report R46499, The Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB) System and Selected Policy Issues, by Darryl E. Getter for more information.) Congress passed the Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery, and Enforcement Act of 1989 (FIRREA, P.L. 101-73), with Title XI establishing provisions for an appraisal regulatory framework.
Title XI's purpose is to protect federal financial and public policy interests. The establishment of appraisal guidelines, for example, is meant to promote the independence of appraisers and reduce possible conflicts of interest with lenders. In addition, reliable appraisals may reduce uncertainty about the market value of the collateral (i.e., properties) that would be used to recoup potential losses facing federally backed lending institutions before calling upon taxpayers to provide financial support.
Appraisal Independence
In 2009, the Home Valuation Code of Conduct (HVCC) was established as part of a legal settlement between New York state officials and the mortgage securitizers Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. Appraisers were suspected of being chosen not on the basis of competence but on their willingness to provide appraisals less likely to obstruct mortgage originations. In the settlement, the New York attorney general agreed to end a state investigation of Fannie Mae if it agreed to purchase mortgages only from banks that separated the loan processing staff from those who chose the loan appraisers. A similar agreement was reached with Freddie Mac.
In 2010, the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (DFA; P.L. 111-203) treated appraisal independence as a consumer protection issue. First, DFA separated residential and commercial appraisal oversight. Rulemaking authority for residential mortgage appraisals was transferred to the CFPB for issues such as customary fees. Authority for commercial real estate appraisals remained with the banking regulators' ASC. Section 1471 of DFA also requires a physical property visit by an appraiser for certain higher-cost mortgages.
Second, DFA revised FIRREA's independence standards and directed the regulators to write new independence rules prior to the HVCC's sunset. Hence, a lender's loan production staff, mortgage brokers, and other transaction participants are prohibited from selecting the appraiser. Section 1472 of DFA prohibits people from attempting to influence an appraiser to encourage a targeted appraisal value or to facilitate the price of the transaction. Section 1472 also mandates that a professional who has a reasonable basis to believe that an appraiser is failing to comply with the USPAP, violating applicable laws, or otherwise engaging in unethical or unprofessional conduct refer the matter to the state appraiser certifying and licensing agency. Consequently, many lenders now order appraisals from appraisal management companies (AMCs), which then randomly select qualified appraisers.
Appraisal Exemption Thresholds
Section 103 of the Economic Growth, Regulatory Relief, and Consumer Protection Act of 2018 (P.L. 115-174) amended FIRREA. P.L. 115-174 directs the CFPB to exempt from appraisal requirements certain federally related, rural real estate transactions valued at or below $400,000 (up from the $250,000 threshold set in 1994) if the lender can document specified difficulties obtaining an appraisal and meeting certain other conditions. The innovation of less expensive automated appraisal valuations has arguably reduced the need for manual appraisals on less expensive homes. Hence, lenders may use automated appraisals (rather than a more expensive licensed or certified appraiser) for exempt residential transactions. The results must still be based upon actual physical condition of the properties rather than unsupported assumptions.
Recent Policy Issue: Appraisal Bias
Following concerns that appraisals were generally biased upward, recent concerns focus on downward appraisal bias, particularly in minority neighborhoods. On February 23, 2022, the CFPB released proposals to prevent algorithmic bias in home valuations. The Biden Administration also announced the establishment of an interagency task force, the Interagency Task Force on Property Appraisal and Valuation Equity (PAVE), led by HUD Secretary Marcia Fudge, to address possible inequities in home appraisals. Observed racial discrepancies in appraisals may reflect the following market influences:
Consequently, distinguishing between causality and correlation—the extent that thin markets, which lack sufficient comparable transactions, or discrimination can explain racial discrepancies in appraisals—is challenging.