Summary
Through appropriations legislation, Congress provides not only budget authority for federal agencies and departments to operate, but also legally binding direction on how that budget authority can (or cannot) be used. Sometimes enacted appropriations measures include authorizing (or "legislative") provisions as well.
These directions may appear in three places in an appropriations act:
1. in the language of individual appropriations;
2. in administrative provisions at the end of a title; and
3. in general provisions at the end of a bill (or division, in the case of a consolidated measure).
Some of these directions directly relate to the management of budget authority enacted in the measure, while others relate to policy or operational matters. As with any facet of legislation, these provisions are not constant. Due to the passage of time or other legislative developments, a provision may require adjustment or lose its relevance. Provisions enacted in appropriations legislation are also a focus of negotiations between the parties and between the chambers during the appropriations process, so provisions can evolve through negotiations until a compromise is worked out in the final measure.
Rather than reciting the entire catalog of more than 100 administrative and general provisions in the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Appropriations Act, 2024, this report focuses on the substantive changes in directions provided from FY2023 to FY2024. It includes changes from the provisions in the DHS Appropriations Act, 2023, reflected in
Introduction
Through appropriations legislation, Congress provides not only budget authority for federal agencies and departments to operate, but also legally binding direction on how that budget authority can (or cannot) be used. Sometimes enacted appropriations measures include authorizing (or "legislative") provisions as well.
These directions may appear in three places in an appropriations act:
Some of these directions directly relate to the management of budget authority enacted in the measure, while others relate to policy or operational matters. As with any facet of legislation, these provisions are not constant. Due to the passage of time or other legislative developments, a provision may require adjustment or lose its relevance. Provisions are also a focus of negotiations between the parties and between the chambers during the appropriations process, so provisions will evolve through negotiations until a compromise is reached and included in the final measure.
While other appropriations reports focus on funding levels provided in the bill, this report focuses on these administrative and general provisions under consideration in the FY2024 appropriations process for the Department of Homeland Security (DHS). It describes the substantive changes in administrative and general provisions from those enacted in FY2023 reflected in the Administration's FY2024 budget request for DHS, and in the House-passed and Senate committee-reported FY2024 DHS appropriations bills.
This report focuses on administrative and general provisions included in:
Rather than listing all the administrative and general provisions considered, this report uses the administrative and general provisions of the enacted DHS Appropriations Act, 2023,1 as a basis for comparison, and notes changes from that starting point.
For each title of the bill, a list of the components funded in the title and a tally of provisions included in the DHS Appropriations Act, 2023 is provided. This is followed by sections analyzing the Administration, House Appropriations Committee, and Senate Appropriations Committee proposals for FY2024, with subsections describing proposals to not include prior-year provisions, substantive changes to provisions being carried forward from FY2023 (ones that would alter the practical effects of the prior year's provisions), and new provisions. It also notes provisions added during consideration of the bill on the House floor in September 2023.
Given the amount of funding provided in the title and the number of administrative provisions, the report starts with Title II, then moves to the other operational components in Title III, the support components in Title IV, and the headquarters components in Title I. The final section in the report deals with general provisions in Title V.
To avoid confusion between differing section numbers in various versions of acts and bills, sections of the FY2023 act are referred to as "FY2023 Sections," those of H.R. 4367 are referred to as "HAC Sections" or "House Sections," those of S. 2625 are referred to as "SAC Sections," and those of P.L. 118-47, "FY2024 Sections."
Appendices include a glossary of abbreviations, notes on other language changes from FY2023 to FY2024, and a brief discussion of the longer-term history of the general and administrative provisions in the DHS appropriations act.
Security, Enforcement, and Investigations Administrative Provisions (Title II)
Title II of the annual DHS appropriations measures typically covers appropriations for
There were 36 administrative provisions included at the end of Title II of the FY2023 act.2 The FY2024 act includes 31: six provisions from FY2023 were not included, two were substantively changed, and one that had not appeared in FY2023 was added. The other 28 remained essentially unchanged.3
Administration-Proposed Changes4
Administration-Proposed Deletions
The Administration had proposed deleting five provisions that had been included in the FY2023 enacted measure:
Administration-Proposed Modifications
The Administration proposed alterations to two provisions, neither of which was included in any of the FY2024 measures:
Administration-Proposed Additions
The Administration proposed three new administrative provisions in the budget request for FY2024. All three had been proposed by the Administration for FY2023 and were not enacted at that time:
None of these proposed new provisions were included in any of the FY2024 measures, either.
Other Changes9
The FY2024 measure did not include three provisions from FY2023 that the Administration had proposed carrying forward:
Program, Project, or Activity |
FY2024 Request |
House-Passed H.R. 4367 |
SAC-Reported S. 2625 |
P.L. 118-47, Division C |
Acquisition and deployment of physical barriers |
$0 |
$2,104,000,000 |
$0 |
$0 |
Acquisition and deployment of border technologies |
229,568,000 |
276,000,000 |
263,300,000 |
283,500,000 |
Trade and travel assets and infrastructure |
305,400,000 |
305,400,000 |
644,296,000 |
380,900,000 |
Facility construction and improvements |
83,768,000 |
119,768,000 |
69,654,000 |
92,114,000 |
Integrated operations assets and infrastructure |
82,732,000 |
123,232,000a |
134,100,000 |
75,983,000 |
Mission support and infrastructure |
17,673,000 |
37,253,000 |
41,179,000 |
17,673,000 |
Total |
$719,141,000 |
$2,965,653,000 |
$1,152,529,000 |
$850,170,000 |
Sources: CRS analysis of U.S. Customs and Border Protection FY2024 Congressional Justification; House-passed H.R. 4367, Section 211; SAC-reported S. 2625, Section 211; and P.L. 118-47, Division C, Section 211.
a. An amendment by Representative Houlahan to this amount to raise the issue of reforms of programs to counter Unmanned Aircraft Systems was included in an en bloc amendment that passed by voice vote, but it did not change the overall amount for this activity.
P.L. 118-47 included one new administrative provision:
Protection, Preparedness, Response, and Recovery Administrative Provisions (Title III)
Title III of annual DHS appropriations measures currently covers appropriations for
There were 11 administrative provisions included at the end of Title III of the DHS Appropriations Act, 2023.12 The FY2024 act included 11 provisions as well: two from FY2023 were not included, and two that did not appear in FY2023 were added. The other nine provisions remained essentially unchanged.13
Administration-Proposed Changes14
The Administration proposed 13 Title III administrative provisions for the FY2024 act: not including one provision enacted for FY2023, substantively changing six others, and including three that had not appeared in the FY2023 act. The other four provisions remained essentially unchanged in the request.15
Administration-Proposed Deletions
The one FY2023 provision not included in the request was FY2023 Section 302, a new statutory provision16 that required the Director of CISA to provide quarterly budget and staffing briefings to the appropriations committees.
Administration-Proposed Modifications
The Administration proposed alterations to five provisions:
Administration-Proposed Additions
The Administration proposed three new administrative provisions in the budget request for FY2024:
Other Changes19
The FY2024 measure did not include one provision from FY2023 that the Administration had proposed carrying forward:
Research, Development, Training, and Services Administrative Provisions (Title IV)
Title IV of annual DHS appropriations measures currently covers appropriations for
There were seven administrative provisions included at the end of Title IV of the DHS Appropriations Act, 2023.20 Likewise, the FY2024 act also included seven provisions at the end of Title IV, with no additions, deletions, or substantive changes.21
Administration-Proposed Changes22
The Administration requested a single additional provision: an administrative provision repealing the termination date for the DHS Countering Weapons of Mass Destruction Office.23
Departmental Management, Intelligence, Situational Awareness and Oversight Administrative Provisions (Title I)
Title I of annual DHS appropriations measures currently covers appropriations for
There were eight administrative provisions included at the end of Title I of the FY2023 act.24 The FY2024 enacted measure included six provisions, as two provisions from FY2023 were not carried forward into FY2024.25
Administration-Proposed Changes26
The Administration proposed six administrative provisions: not including three provisions, substantively changing none, and including one provision that had not appeared in FY2023. The other five provisions remained essentially unchanged in the request.
Administration-Proposed Deletions
The Administration proposed not including three provisions:
Administration-Proposed Additions
The Administration also proposed a new general provision to establish a "Department of Homeland Security Southwest Border Contingency Operations Fund," through which the Secretary could provide CBP, ICE, and FEMA up to $4.7 billion in total emergency-designated appropriations, contingent on the cumulative number of migrant encounters at the border each quarter.29
Other Changes30
The FY2024 measure did not include one provision from FY2023 that the Administration had proposed carrying forward:
As noted earlier, Title V of the annual DHS appropriations act has historically contained general provisions, the impact of which may reach across the government, apply to the entire department, affect multiple components, or focus on a single activity. Title V often includes provisions that make additional appropriations and others that make rescissions—cancellations of previously provided budget authority.
Some Provisions Are More General Than Others There are general provisions not included in this report that affect DHS; their effect is so broad they cover the entire federal government. Title VII of the Financial Services and General Government Appropriations Act includes these broadest general provisions, which address a range of issues. |
There were 49 general provisions included in Title V of the DHS Appropriations Act, 2023.32 The FY2024 enacted measure included 51 provisions: nine provisions from FY2023 were not included, four were substantively changed, and 11 that had not appeared in FY2023 were added—four of which did not pertain to DHS, but provided modifications to previously enacted appropriations measures. The other 36 remained essentially unchanged.33
Rescissions are cancellations of previously appropriated but unobligated budget authority. They reduce the net budget authority provided by the bill, lowering its "score" against budget allocations and statutory budget limits. Traditionally, they are found at the end of Title V of the DHS Appropriations Act. As they are distinct in form and function from the policy provisions of Title V, those five FY2024 provisions (two of which appeared in the FY2023 bill, and three of which did not) are addressed separately at the end of the section.
Administration-Proposed Changes34
The Administration proposed 37 general provisions for the DHS Appropriations Act, 2024: it proposed not including 13 provisions (one of which was a rescissions provision), substantively changing one (another rescissions provision), and including one that had not appeared in FY2023. The other 36 provisions remained essentially unchanged.
Administration-Proposed Deletions
The Administration's FY2024 request did not carry forward the following provisions that had been included in the FY2023 act:
Administration-Proposed Additions
The Administration proposed one new general provision: The Administration sought the ability to transfer up to 5% of any appropriation into the "Information Technology Modernization Fund" for DHS that was authorized under the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2018.42 The Biden Administration first proposed this provision in its FY2022 budget request.
Other Changes43
Two general provisions were not carried forward from the FY2023 to the FY2024 enacted measure. Neither had been included in the House-passed or the Senate-reported FY2024 bill:
Other than rescissions provisions, the FY2024 measure made substantive changes to two general provisions carried forward from the FY2023 act:
Four non-rescissions provisions affecting DHS that had not been included in the FY2023 measure were added to the FY2024 act:
Added Provisions Unrelated to DHS
Four other new general provisions were added to provide corrections for measures in P.L. 118-42 and P.L. 117-328. FY2024 Section 548 corrects a subappropriation in Division E, and Sections 549-551 make corrections to Community Project Funding / Congressionally Directed Spending projects in P.L. 118-42, Division F and P.L. 117-328, Division L.
Rescission Provisions (and Others Reducing the Score of the Act)
Five separate general provisions are included in the FY2024 appropriations measure that reduce the overall discretionary "score" of the act, compared to two in FY2023. In all, these provisions reduced the overall discretionary score of the FY2024 act by almost $1.7 billion. By comparison, the FY2023 act had $394 million in rescissions.
The Administration proposed one such general provision, canceling $56 million in current unobligated appropriations from previously provided appropriations in 18 different DHS accounts. A parallel provision in the FY2024 act rescinds $239 million from 22 different DHS accounts.
Table 2 includes a comparison of the rescission proposal made by the Administration in March 2023, passed by the House in September 2023, made by the Senate Appropriations Committee in July 2023, and ultimately enacted in March 2024 as FY2024 Section 543.
Designation |
Request |
House-Passed H.R. 4367, |
SAC-Reported S. 2625, |
P.L. 118-47, Div. C, |
OSEM O&S |
800 |
800 |
— |
800 |
Management Directorate |
4,100 |
4,100 |
— |
4,100 |
CBP PC&I |
1,473 |
1,473 |
1,473 |
1,473 |
CBP BSFIT |
1,842 |
1,842 |
1,842 |
1,842 |
CBP Air and Marine Interdiction |
452 |
452 |
452 |
450 |
CBP PC&I FY2020 |
— |
1,159,000 |
— |
— |
CBP PC&I FY2021 |
— |
945,000 |
— |
— |
ICE O&S (expiring in FY2024) |
3,000 |
3,000 |
1,000 |
3,000 |
ICE O&S (not expiring) |
2,093 |
2,093 |
2,093 |
782 |
ICE Automation Modernization |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
TSA O&S |
— |
154,515 |
— |
— |
TSA O&S (not expiring) |
— |
— |
63,591 |
— |
USCG AC&I |
22,600 |
22,600 |
22,600 |
22,600 |
USCG PC&I |
— |
— |
— |
150,000 |
USSS O&S |
2,400 |
— |
2,400 |
2,400 |
USSS PC&I |
4,000 |
— |
4,000 |
4,000 |
CISA PC&I |
3,500 |
3,500 |
3,500 |
3,500 |
CISA R&D |
2,000 |
2,000 |
— |
2,000 |
FEMA PDM Fund |
5,821 |
5,821 |
— |
5,821 |
USCIS O&S |
— |
— |
— |
40 |
FLETC PC&I |
800 |
800 |
800 |
47 |
S&T O&S |
900 |
900 |
900 |
900 |
CWMD R&D (expiring in FY2024) |
389 |
389 |
389 |
2,000 |
CWMD PC&I (expiring in FY2024) |
— |
— |
— |
2,900 |
CWMD PC&I (expiring in FY2025) |
— |
— |
— |
19,700 |
CWMD R&D (expiring in FY2024) |
— |
— |
— |
11,208 |
CWMD (not expiring) |
11 |
11 |
11 |
11 |
Total Rescissions |
56,191 |
2,308,306 |
105,061 |
238,802 |
Source: CRS analysis of H.Rept. 118-123, S.Rept. 118-72, and P.L. 118-47.
Note: Abbreviations available in Appendix A.
Two more enacted provisions rescinded DHS resources to offset the overall discretionary cost of the FY2024 act:
Two other new enacted provisions used rescissions from other departments and transfers to accomplish the same kind of reduction:
$320 million of the U.S. Secret Service Operations and Support appropriation was to be funded from the Presidential Election Campaign Fund, and $364 million in the FEMA Federal Assistance appropriations was to be derived from a transfer from unobligated FEMA grant funding in the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (IIJA) for dam safety grants.
Appendix A. Glossary of Abbreviations
Acronym |
Meaning |
BRIC |
Building Resilient Infrastructure and Communities |
CBP |
U.S. Customs and Border Protection |
CISA |
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency |
CRS |
Congressional Research Service |
DHS |
U.S. Department of Homeland Security |
DRF |
Disaster Relief Fund |
FEMA |
Federal Emergency Management Agency |
FLETC |
Federal Law Enforcement Training Centers |
HAC |
House Appropriations Committee |
ICE |
U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement |
OIG |
Office of Inspector General |
OMB |
Office of Management and Budget |
OSEM |
Office of the Secretary and Executive Management |
O&S |
Operations and Support |
PC&I |
Procurement, Construction, and Improvements |
R&D |
Research and Development |
S&T |
Science and Technology Directorate |
SAC |
Senate Appropriations Committee |
TSA |
Transportation Security Administration |
USCG |
U.S. Coast Guard |
USSS |
U.S. Secret Service |
Appendix B. Changes to Appropriations Language in P.L. 118-47
Occasionally, the language of the appropriations changes, either for technical reasons, or to reinforce a message to an agency. From FY2023 to FY2024, a handful of such changes were made:
Appendix C. Evolution of Administrative and General Provisions in the DHS Appropriations Act
The structure of the annual DHS appropriations act has evolved significantly since its initial development in the FY2004 cycle.
Initial appropriations structures were not consistent across the bill, and departmental reorganizations shifted parts and responsibilities across the department. Even so, some of the original general provisions from the FY2004 act are included in the current annual appropriations act.
The overall structure of the department stabilized with the FY2008 act, and for a decade, the structure of the bill was relatively stable from year to year. With the enactment of the FY2017 act, two major changes occurred: a common appropriations structure was applied over almost all of the DHS components; and directive language was shifted from individual appropriations provisos and some Title V General Provisions into groups of "administrative provisions" at the end of each title. The structure of the bill has remained relatively consistent since.
The following appendix looks at each of these years—FY2004, as the first year; FY2008, as the year of significant reorganization; and FY2017, as the first year of the Common Appropriations Structure and administrative provisions—to highlight where many of the long-standing provisions of the DHS appropriations act originated.
The First DHS Appropriations Act: FY2004
The first annual appropriations measure for DHS was passed by Congress a week before the beginning of its fiscal year. Initial budget justification materials presented to Congress were minimal, but the bill moved relatively quickly and passed with near-unanimity.
While the titles of the DHS appropriations measure have changed slightly, and several components have been reorganized, the general structure of the titles of the measure has remained consistent:
Appropriations Titles I-IV
Within the first four titles, however, component appropriations were structured differently. New components, like DHS headquarters and management functions, and the U.S. Visitor and Immigrant Status Indicator Technology project received single appropriations. Others, like the U.S. Coast Guard, received appropriations in structures paralleling what they had received in FY2003. New major components—U.S. Customs and Border Protection and Immigration and Customs Enforcement—generally followed the structure of legacy Customs Service appropriations.
These appropriations included direction to the individual components through provisos within the statement of appropriations themselves, rather than as administrative or general provisions. Some of these were statutory directions to use certain amounts for certain activities, such as facilities improvements, while others were prohibitions on the use of funds, such as prohibitions on construction of border checkpoints. Some appropriations were withheld until certain conditions were met, such as providing a spend plan to the appropriations committees that met certain parameters. Administrative provisions were included in some appropriations measures at the time, often providing direction across multiple appropriations, but no such provisions appeared in the initial DHS appropriations act.
In what was standard practice for the time, rescissions, or cancellation of previously appropriated budget authority, were included immediately after the statement of appropriations for the target account.
General Provisions
Twenty-one general provisions were included in the initial DHS appropriations act, and eight continue to be carried forward each year as general provisions in the annual act:
Several of these general provisions were one-time provisions that provided authorizations or restrictions beyond FY2004, or converted structure and functions of formerly independent components into DHS functions.
Others provided direction to the department or its components:
The Post-Katrina DHS Appropriations Act: FY2008
After several years of reorganization, and the refocusing of departmental priorities through the Post Katrina Emergency Management Reform Act (PKEMRA), the structure of DHS and its funding had shifted.
The DHS Appropriations Act, 2008, was enacted in a different fashion than its predecessors. The FY2004 act was a stand-alone measure, signed into law on the first day of the fiscal year. Each of the next three years, the bill was enacted as a stand-alone measure within the first month of the fiscal year. The FY2008 act was signed into law as a division of a consolidated appropriations measure almost three months into the fiscal year. Some observers note this as an indicator of increasing challenges in passing the measure.
Appropriations Titles I-IV
The FY2008 Act included several components that had not appeared in the first DHS appropriations act, as well as a reconstituted FEMA. New components are noted below, but the general structure of the titles of the measure remained, with slight changes to the names of Titles III and IV:
The structure of direction through appropriations provisos remained unchanged. However, rescissions now were included in the general provisions in Title V, in part because the evolved structure of the appropriations themselves did not necessarily align with the desired rescissions, which by their nature, come from prior year accounts.
General Provisions—Title V
Seventy-three general provisions were included in the FY2008 DHS appropriations act. They included several sections of significant length making changes to the U.S. Code, including legislation on the secure handling of ammonium nitrate (Section 563), modifications to the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996 (Section 564), and modifications to the International Registered Traveler Program (Section 565). In addition, a sixth title was included in the act, containing the "Border Infrastructure and Technology Modernization Act of 2007."
Several other general provisions that are still part of the current structure of the DHS appropriations act appeared in FY2008:
The Common Appropriations Structure DHS Appropriations Act: FY2017
When DHS was established in 2003, components of other agencies were brought together over a matter of months, in the midst of ongoing budget cycles. Rather than developing a new structure of appropriations for the entire department, Congress and the Administration continued to provide resources through existing account structures when possible.
At the direction of Congress, in 2014 DHS began to work on a new Common Appropriations Structure (CAS), which would standardize the format of DHS appropriations across components. This would be the most significant restructuring of DHS appropriations since its establishment. In an interim report in 2015, DHS noted that operating with "over 70 different appropriations and over 100 Programs, Projects, and Activities ... has contributed to a lack of transparency, inhibited comparisons between programs, and complicated spending decisions and other managerial decision-making."51
After several years of work and negotiations with Congress, DHS made its first budget request in the CAS for FY2017, and implemented it while operating under the continuing resolutions funding the department in October 2016.52 Part of the restructuring of the appropriations included the addition of administrative provisions, shifting instructions that had been included in language of specific appropriations or in general provisions into sections at the end of each title. Table C-1 shows total general provisions and administrative provisions for the last ten enacted DHS appropriations acts.
Table C-1. Tally of General and Administrative Provisions, FY2015-FY2024
(Annual appropriations measures)
General Provisions |
Administrative Provisions |
|||||
Fiscal Year |
Title V |
Title I |
Title II |
Title III |
Title IV |
Total |
2015 |
78 |
78 |
||||
2016 |
75 |
75 |
||||
2017 |
44 |
8 |
28 |
12 |
9 |
101 |
2018 |
45 |
7 |
31 |
8 |
8 |
99 |
2019 |
40 |
6 |
31 |
9 |
8 |
94 |
2020 |
40 |
5 |
36 |
7 |
7 |
95 |
2021 |
42 |
6 |
35 |
11 |
7 |
101 |
2022 |
48 |
8 |
36 |
11 |
8 |
111 |
2023 |
49 |
8 |
36 |
11 |
7 |
111 |
2024 |
51 |
6 |
31 |
11 |
7 |
106 |
Source: CRS analysis of enacted DHS appropriations.
Note: Administrative provisions first appeared in DHS annual appropriations in the FY2017 act (P.L. 115-56, Division F).
1. |
P.L. 117-328, Div. F. |
2. |
Descriptions of these provisions can be found in the FY2023 consolidated appropriations measure's explanatory statement, as printed in "Explanatory Statement Submitted by Mr. Leahy, Chair of the Senate Committee on Appropriations, Regarding H.R. 2617, Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2023," Senate, Congressional Record, vol. 168, no. 198, Book II (December 20, 2022), pp. S8564-S8565. (Hereinafter, "FY2023 Explanatory Statement.") |
3. |
The text of these provisions and their descriptions can be found in the committee print of the Further Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2024. (U.S. Congress, House Appropriations Committee, Further Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2024 [Legislative Text and Explanatory Statement], committee print, prepared by Committee on Appropriations, U.S. House of Representatives, 118th Cong., 2nd sess., May 6, 2024, 55-008 (Hereinafter, "FY2024 Committee Print"); provisions on pp. 527-532, descriptions on pp. 580-582. |
4. |
CRS analysis of Office of Management and Budget, Fiscal Year 2024 Budget of the U.S. Government: Appendix, March 11, 2024, pp. 533-534, https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/BUDGET-2024-APP/pdf/BUDGET-2024-APP.pdf (hereinafter, FY2024 Appendix); and P.L. 117-328, Division F. |
5. |
P.L. 115-141, Div. F, Section 230. A variant of this provision was carried in P.L. 115-31, Div. F, Title VI, where direction was provided in a supplemental appropriation for CBP's Procurement, Construction, and Improvements account (131 Stat. 433). |
6. |
P.L. 117-103, Div. F, Section 231. |
7. | |
8. |
TSA Administrator David P. Pekoske, in testimony before the House Appropriations Committee, described an unconstrained capital investment plan as one "that describes an ideal future state in which TSA is able to buy down more risk to the transportation sector with additional resources." The text of his full testimony is available at https://www.tsa.gov/news/press/testimony/2023/03/29/fiscal-year-2024-presidents-budget-request-transportation-security. |
9. |
CRS analysis of P.L. 117-328, Division F; H.R. 4367; S. 2625, and P.L. 118-47, Division C. |
10. |
Prior to FY2018, this flexibility was included in the language of USCG's Operating Expenses appropriation. |
11. |
Reprogramming is the action of shifting budget authority from one program, project, or activity to another. |
12. |
Descriptions of these provisions can be found in "FY2023 Explanatory Statement," p. S8679. |
13. |
The text of these provisions and their descriptions can be found in "FY2024 Committee Print"; provisions on pp. 536-537, descriptions on pp. 588-589. |
14. |
CRS analysis of Appendix, pp. 518-520; and P.L. 117-328, Division F. |
15. |
Office of Management and Budget, Fiscal Year 2025 Budget of the U.S. Government: Appendix, March 11, 2024 (Washington, DC: GPO, 2024), pp. 533-534. (Hereinafter, "Appendix.") |
16. |
The requirement had originally been laid out in the explanatory statement accompanying the FY2022 DHS Appropriations Act. The administrative provision put the requirement in law, and curtailed certain CISA funding unless the briefings were provided within a certain time frame. |
17. |
A similar provision was included in the FY2022 act (P.L. 117-328, Div. F, Section 301). |
18. |
This had been proposed in the FY2023 budget request as well. |
19. |
CRS analysis of P.L. 117-328, Division F; H.R. 4367; S. 2625, and P.L. 118-47, Division C. |
20. |
Descriptions of these provisions can be found in the "FY2023 Explanatory Statement," p. S8582. |
21. |
The text of these provisions and their descriptions can be found in the "FY2024 Committee Print"; provisions on pp. 590-540, descriptions on p. 594. |
22. |
CRS analysis of Appendix, p. 544; and P.L. 117-328, Division F. |
23. |
See 6 U.S.C. §591(e). |
24. |
Descriptions of these provisions can be found in "FY2023 Explanatory Statement," p. S8556. |
25. |
The text of these provisions and their descriptions can be found in the "FY2024 Committee Print"; provisions on pp. 520-523, descriptions on p. 566. |
26. |
CRS analysis of FY2024 Appendix, pp. 494-495, and P.L. 117-328, Division F. |
27. |
The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) defines a major acquisition as "a capital project that requires special management attention because of its: (1) importance to an agency's mission; (2) high development, operating, or maintenance costs; (3) high risk; (4) high return; or (5) significant role in the administration of an agency's programs, finances, property, or other resources." |
28. |
A list of all DHS major acquisitions developed by the DHS Office of Program Accountability and Risk Management. |
29. |
For more details on this proposal, see CRS Report R47496, DHS Budget Request Analysis: FY2024, p. 2 on the type of appropriation, and pp. 9-10 on the triggers. |
30. |
CRS analysis of P.L. 117-328, Division F; H.R. 4367; S. 2625, and P.L. 118-47, Division C. |
31. |
P.L. 110-28, §3502, after which it was picked up as a general provision in FY2008 annual appropriations measure (P.L. 110-161, §556) and moved to an administrative provision in FY2017 (P.L. 115-31, §104). |
32. |
Descriptions of these provisions can be found in the "FY2023 Explanatory Statement," pp. S8582-S8584. |
33. |
The text of these provisions and their descriptions can be found in the "FY2024 Committee Print"; provisions on pp. 540-555, descriptions on pp. 594-599. |
34. |
CRS analysis of FY2024 Appendix, pp. 544-549; and P.L. 117-328, Division F. |
35. |
P.L. 115-31, Div. F, Section 544. |
36. |
P.L. 116-260, Div. F, Section 537. |
37. |
P.L. 116-260, Div. F, Section 542. |
38. |
P.L. 115-31, Div. F, Section 532. |
39. |
P.L. 116-136, Div. B, Title VI, Section 16005. |
40. |
P.L. 112-74, Div. D, Section 541. The provision was also carried in the Full-Year Continuing Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 112-10, Div. B) as Section 1112. |
41. |
A related general provision, which also included funding for FEMA, was first included in the FY2022 act: P.L. 117-103, Div. F, Section 543. |
42. |
P.L. 115-91, Div. A, Title X, Section 1077(b)(1). |
43. |
CRS analysis of P.L. 117-328, Division F; H.R. 4367; S. 2625, and P.L. 118-47, Division C. |
44. |
P.L. 110-161, Div. E, Section 520. |
45. |
P.L. 111-83, Section 570. |
46. |
P.L. 117-103, Div. F, Section 538. |
47. |
Future appropriations measures restated some of these authorities in different fashions: therefore, these should not be considered enduring authorities. |
48. |
As defined under section 307 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. §1307). |
49. |
This body, the Federal Law Enforcement Training Accrediting Board, was established, and has continued to receive direction from the administrative provisions under Title IV in the Department of Homeland Security Appropriations Act. |
50. |
The Information Analysis and Infrastructure Protection Directorate, which had appeared in this title in FY2004, was reorganized into Analysis and Operations and the National Protection and Programs Directorate, and no longer appeared in this title in the FY2008 Act. |
51. |
Office of the Chief Financial Officer, A Common Appropriations Structure for DHS: FY2016 Crosswalk, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, February 2, 2015, p. 2. |
52. |
The Coast Guard, due to limitations of its financial management system, did not implement the system until FY2019. |