In 1938, Congress enacted the Foreign Agents Registration Act (FARA) to reduce the influence of foreign propaganda circulating in the United States. Anticipating that greater transparency could help achieve these ends, Congress imposed new registration, reporting, and record-keeping requirements on individuals and entities acting within the United States on behalf of foreign interests.
While the act has been amended many times, the early framework endures: persons defined as "agents" of a "foreign principal" must register with the U.S. government, make a public record of the nature of their principal-agent relationship, and maintain all private records for official inspection. FARA includes broad registration exemptions, however, and, because there have been relatively few administrative or judicial enforcement actions over the years, a number of ambiguities about the scope of the act's requirements and exemptions persist.
Who Is a Foreign Principal?
FARA defines foreign principal to include
Who Is a Foreign Agent?
FARA's definition of agent of a foreign principal has three necessary components that focus on the type of influence exerted over the agent, who is wielding influence over the agent, and the activities the agent is performing as part of this relationship.
First, an agent must act at "the order, request, or under the direction or control" of another. The Second Circuit has recognized that the "exact parameters of a 'request' under the act are difficult to locate, falling somewhere between a command and a plea." Holding that no single factor is determinative, the court determined that "[o]nce a foreign principal establishes a particular course of conduct to be followed, those who respond to its 'request' for complying action may properly be found to be agents under the Act." This is a broader conception of agency than courts traditionally apply in other areas of law, where a "request" may not be enough to establish that the agent's actions subject the principal to legal liability.
Second, an agent must act at the behest of either (1) a foreign principal or (2) a person whose activities are "directly or indirectly supervised, directed, controlled, financed, or subsidized in whole or in major part by a foreign principal." Some lower courts have held that an entity that receives foreign funding and acts to the benefit of foreign interests is not required to register under FARA unless the foreign funder subjects the recipient to its direction or control.
Third, an agent must act within the United States in one of the following ways:
Who Is Exempt?
FARA provides that the following entities are not required to register under the act:
Reporting and Record-Keeping Requirements
Agents of foreign principals that are not otherwise exempt must comply with FARA's registration requirements, disclosure requirements, and record-keeping requirements.
Covered entities must file a registration statement with the DOJ within 10 days of becoming an agent of a foreign principal. The registration statement must include, among other information, the name and address of every foreign principal for whom the agent is acting, a comprehensive statement of the activities to be performed by the agent on behalf of the foreign principal, and the nature and amount of compensation the agent is to receive for these efforts. Agents must update these filings every six months.
An agent of a foreign principal must also file public copies of any "informational materials" that the agent disseminates among two or more persons in the interests of a foreign principal. These materials must include a conspicuous statement that the materials are distributed by an agent on behalf of a foreign principal.
Agents must also maintain all written records with respect to their activities for inspection by U.S. law enforcement.
Enforcement
Violations of FARA are subject to criminal and civil penalties. Generally, a person who "willfully" violates the act may face up to five years in prison and up to a $10,000 fine.
A 2016 inspector general audit reported that historically the DOJ's practice has been to pursue voluntary compliance rather than prosecution for agents who failed to register under the act. Between 1966, when FARA was amended to resemble its current form, and 2015, the DOJ brought seven criminal FARA cases. More recently, however, the DOJ has signaled that it is shifting "from treating FARA as an administrative obligation ... to one that is increasingly an enforcement priority." For example, Special Counsel Robert Mueller's investigation into Russian influence during the 2016 election resulted in several high-profile FARA convictions. In 2022, the DOJ reported it charged a record number of criminal FARA cases. Additionally, in rare uses of its civil enforcement power, in 2019 the DOJ required a Florida broadcast company involved in the distribution of a Russian radio channel to register as a foreign agent, and in 2022 the DOJ sued to compel a U.S. businessperson to register as a foreign agent.
Proposals for Reform
A 2016 DOJ inspector general report recommended several legislative changes that could help the DOJ administer and enforce FARA, including the following:
In December 2021, the DOJ issued an Advanced Notice of Proposed Rulemaking seeking suggestions for any potential amendments to, or clarifications of, the current FARA implementing regulations. The DOJ sought preliminary input on matters such as the scope of an agency relationship with a foreign principal, FARA exemptions, advisory opinions, and labeling of informational materials.
In recent years, congressional interest in FARA has increased. Several bills were introduced (but not enacted) in the 117th Congress that sought to amend various parts of FARA. Broadly, some of these bills proposed to:
Document ID: IF11439