← Browse

Fisher v. UT–Austin and the Future of Racial Preferences in College Admissions

Fisher v. UT–Austin and the Future of Racial Preferences in College Admissions

COMMENTARY Civil Rights

Fisher v. UT–Austin and the Future of Racial Preferences in College Admissions

Aug 10, 2016 1 min read

Abigail Fisher made a second trip to the Supreme Court of the United States this term, in her challenge to the University of Texas at Austin’s race-conscious admissions program. In 2013, the Supreme Court ruled 7-1 in her favor, finding that the lower courts were too deferential to school officials. But this time around, four justices found that deference “must be given” when school officials give a “reasoned, principled explanation” for why they must discriminate against some applicants in favor of certain preferred minority applicants. Now that Fisher has reached the end of the road, what happens next with racial preferences in college admissions?

Read the full article here.

Heritage Offers

Activate your 2025 Membership

By activating your membership you'll become part of a committed group of fellow patriots who stand for America's Founding principles.

The Heritage Guide to the Constitution

Receive a clause-by-clause analysis of the Constitution with input from more than 100 scholars and legal experts.

American Founders

In this FREE, extensive eBook, you will learn about how our Founders used intellect, prudence, and courage to create the greatest nation in the world.

Document ID: fisher-v-ut-austin-and-the-future-racial-preferences-college-admissions